<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:44:36 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Euclid Managers Insurance Web Log</title><link>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/</link><description>Internet, Tech, Media, Manufacturers and MPL Insurance Blog</description><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright>copyright 2004-2009, Euclid Managers, LLC</copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Loss of Use Coverage Key to Court’s Decision Requiring Insurer to Defend</title><category>Claim Examples</category><category>Defense and Settlement</category><category>Internet</category><category>Media</category><category>Tech</category><dc:creator>Marcia Sutton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:31:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/loss-of-use-coverage-key-to-courts-decision-requiring-insure.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9269:65139:8673155</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent appellate court decision in the case of Eyeblaster, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company offers a potentially unexpected interpretation of the property damage provisions of a General Liability policy.</p><br>
<p>In the case, Eyeblaster, an online marketing campaign company, was sued by a third party alleging Eyeblaster infected his computer with a spyware program. The claimant alleged he lost tax return data and incurred a financial loss.&nbsp; Among the many allegations, were trespass, invasion of privacy and intentionally accessing a protected computer without authorization. The claimant advised he experienced pop-up ads, hijacked browser, slow computer performance and random error messages and alleged that while no repair was possible, his computer did become operational again.</p><br>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/rss-comments-entry-8673155.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Technology Exposures and Procuring Privacy/Security Protection</title><category>Invasion of Privacy</category><category>MPL</category><category>Security</category><dc:creator>Marcia Sutton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/technology-exposures-and-procuring-privacysecurity-protectio.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9269:65139:8515731</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/071910-it-pros-lurking-legal-gotchas.html?page=1">Network World</a> recently published an article outlining several areas of exposure for Information Technology professionals and essentially any company using technology to run its business.&nbsp; The article highlights the importance of licensing software and points out the IT professional could have personal liability as the individual who makes the illegal copy is technically the infringer.&nbsp; Also, <a href="http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/texting-and-employee-privacy.html">the article mentions a case we previously discussed</a> involving whether or not employee text messages are private. &nbsp;<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20008058-38.html">In this case</a>, the Supreme Court did decide that the employee does not have an expectation of privacy for text messages, even personal ones, sent via the pager issued by the employer.&nbsp;
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/rss-comments-entry-8515731.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Purchasing General Liability and Professional Liability Together: The Dangers of Putting All Your Eggs in One Basket.</title><category>Internet</category><category>MPL</category><category>Manufacturer</category><category>Media</category><category>Tech</category><dc:creator>Kristine Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:24:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/purchasing-general-liability-and-professional-liability-toge.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9269:65139:8375900</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Do you agree with the adage, &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t put all your eggs in one basket?&rdquo;&nbsp; &nbsp;The traditional response is yes; however, a recent trend in the insurance industry is causing some to throw that adage out the door.</p>

<p>The trend is to advise the Insured that it is advantageous to purchase General Liability and Professional Liability insurance with the same carrier.&nbsp; But this is not always true.</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/rss-comments-entry-8375900.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Naked Cowboy Asks Naked Cowgirl to Cease and Desist</title><category>Claim Examples</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><dc:creator>Marcia Sutton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:07:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/naked-cowboy-asks-naked-cowgirl-to-cease-and-desist.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9269:65139:8244554</guid><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/rss-comments-entry-8244554.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Red Flag Rules Deadline Extended Again</title><category>Identity Theft</category><dc:creator>Marcia Sutton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/red-flag-rules-deadline-extended-again.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9269:65139:8023076</guid><description><![CDATA[The FTC&rsquo;s deadline for businesses to develop an <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule">Identity Theft Prevention Program</a> was once again extended.&nbsp; Now, companies have until the end of the year to develop a program.&nbsp; The purpose of the extension is to allow Congress time for further exploration into what types of business should be subject to The Red Flag Rules (The Rule).&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;Currently, The Rule applies to financial institutions and creditors with covered accounts.&nbsp; The FTC has specific definitions for financial institutions, creditors and covered accounts as described below.
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.euclidmanagers.com/home/rss-comments-entry-8023076.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>